Race

Ted talk video “Witness Unconscious Bias”

I know that this is my White Fragility and a bit of ignorance talking but I was really saddened by the notion that Josephine Kwhali knew what racism was at the age of 4. How racism permeates through the different stages of life in subtle and not so subtle ways which means that a little girl understands that she is being treated differently from her peers because of the colour of her skin.

The only racism I had to think about growing up in Germany was the Nazi racism we were taught about at school spanning several years, illuminating history from many different angles and even speaking to concentration camp survivors. 

I think it’s super important how this part of history is critically discussed and made a big topic at German schools. We were taught that for things to never get this bad again we need to know that it happened and understand how it came about, but I think this probably polarised my view on what counts as racism.

This kind of historic learning seems in stark contrast to how British colonial history is only just now being woven into the British school curricula. When I took the Life in the UK test in 2016 to become a British citizen, there was little to learn about that part of history and there was a petition signed by over 180 historians in 2020 to change the required knowledge for the test. (Abraham, I. et al. (2020)).

Coming back to (un)conscious bias I don’t remember when I became conscious of my biases and privileges but it was not until way into adulthood. As a White person there was no need to identify as ‘White’ as it was the norm where I grew up. You just are. People just love you for who you are. And those that dislike you dislike you for your personality, not your race.

I can’t just switch off my racial bias but I am getting better at recognising and questioning it.

Hahn Tapper (2013) ‘A pedagogy of social justice education: social identity, theory and intersectionality’,
Read Pp. 411- 417 (and see diagram on p.426)

This diagram shows the pathway to Pedagogy of Social Justice Education (as undertaken by the organisation described in the article).
It starts with the Freiran notions of social justice in education which proposes to focus on giving everyone the tools to make their own arguments to overcome their sense of powerlessness in any social or political environment. This means engaging in critical thinking and weighing different perspectives, enabled through dialogue in which both students and teachers are open with their views and about the views of each other.
Each of the other pillars sequentially build on one another and give the theoretical basis but also practical direction for the pedagogy.

In my understanding the basis for Social Justice Education (SJE) is that any encounter in classroom groups are influenced by their social relationships outside the classroom. Social Justice Education does not aim to diminish those differences but to make them part of the conversation and foster understanding. It aims to empower students to become independent thinkers, based on their individual standing in society.

I think that one important aspect of SJE comes from accepting that opinions differ and maintain mutual respect regardless.
This paper made me think of an episode of the podcast “Unlocking Us”: ‘Brene Brown with President Barack Obama on leadership, family and service’. In the conversation Obama describes how it is important to be able to ‘hold the tension of opposites’, to not dismiss an opposing opinion and to incrementally improve on things with that knowledge. He believes that recognising that two opposing opinions can both be true can make us better leaders and I think it also makes us better teachers.

Within the graphic design course I teach on we often ask students to make their projects personal and infuse their design with their unique perspective. During the design process we encourage experiments that break away from what we teach in the classroom and during the marking we highly value those individual approaches. Some students simply ‘get it’, looking back now these are probably more privileged and often White, and others don’t.
However a critical dialogue about what design means to anyone individually has never really been part of the way I teach. We ask students to be open and share parts of their identities without acknowledging the social construct of the classroom. Have I disadvantaged students who didn’t feel they could share part of their identity within the course? How can I introduce myself to enable students to do the same? I need to be more aware of my Whiteliness within my role as a teacher.

Terms of reference from SoN around Race

This issue contains such a wealth of truthful conversation and deeply felt expressions around race, racism and identity. I love that it’s a collection of different media including poems, artworks and drawings embracing the broad spectrum of expression within art education.

One quote from Terry Finnigan really struck me: 

“Most whites live their lives in segregation and mainly only mix with whites. And yet society does not teach us to see this as a loss.” (p.14)

My social environment is predominantly white and so are most of the companies and institutions I work with. I celebrate diversity on so many levels, yet I am quite segregated in my immediate environment.

I very much saw myself in the interview with a senior member of university staff who was questioned on his involvement with furthering inclusivity (pp. 27-31). The responses came awkwardly like many White people (myself included) behave when talking about race-related issues, tip-toeing around terms like ‘Black’ and seeking approval for their words and circumstances.

As with some of the previous reading on this module my bias was whispering in my ear that the staff member in questions had to be male but there is no evidence of that whatsoever and it’s irrelevant to the conversation. Like Tiffany Webster says in the article that follows this one I was looking for social cues as to who it might be and how much crossover there is in identity – probably to ‘distance’ myself from their (in-)actions and awkwardness. I appreciated the discussion about whether or not this interview should stay anonymous and I think it was more impactful for being anonymous.

Once I started seeing race (after shedding my colour blindness) I see that racism is everywhere, deeply engrained in the fabric of institutions as well as in the streets. Like the senior member of staff in the article mentioned above I will hopefully come back 18 months later and have put some of my learnings and thoughts into action, especially within my classroom.

Shades of Noir

When I first accessed Shades of Noir in 2020 as part of preparation for moving teaching online I was overwhelmed with the amount of resources and information and I quickly navigated away. 
Throughout the Inclusive Unit we were tasked with looking at specific articles and resources and I now have a good feel for what the site has to offer and it’s such an essential reference for anti-racism in pedagogy, conversations arounds inclusivity and notions of intersectionality.
The case studies and conversations around different aspects of education and art were particularly useful to me, not just from a pedagogic perspective, but they will also be a great resource to point students towards in the future. That way I can hopefully foster more critical reflection on the way design is created, it’s potential for social change and the responsibility of the designer. It’s also useful that the conversations are categorised, so they’re very accessible.

One thing I was struggling with a little was reading the terms of references / journals in the browser (through issuu). I have quite a big screen but it was still very small text and fiddly to make it legible. I also couldn’t find a way to use the brilliant accessibility tools within it, so I often lost track of where I was within the reading and read paragraphs over and over.

List of References

Tapper, H. (2013) ‘A pedagogy of social justice education: social identity, theory and intersectionality’.

Ted talk video “Witness Unconscious Bias” Josephine Kwhali, available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6XDUGPoaFw

Brown, B. (2020), Unlocking Us [Podcast]. ‘Brene Brown with President Barack Obama on leadership, family and service’, 7th Dec 2020, available at: https://brenebrown.com/podcast/brene-with-president-barack-obama-on-leadership-family-and-service/

Abraham, I., Gbikpi, N., Hardwick, T, O’Leary, B, Savjani., M. (2020), What does the Life in the UK Handbook say about who the British people are?, available at: https://www.freemovement.org.uk/what-does-the-life-in-the-uk-handbook-say-about-who-the-british-people-are/

Peekabo We See You: Whiteness, available at: https://issuu.com/shadesofnoir/docs/peekaboo_we_see_you_whiteness

4 thoughts on “Race

  1. Hi Svenja,

    I think that there are parallels in growing up in Germany and growing up in South Africa. The wrongs that have been perpetrated against one group of people by another group is interwoven into one’s identity. It is shocking that the UK has only recently started to address its extremely brutal colonial history in the school curriculum.

    I totally agree with you that one needs to be more aware of one’s ‘whiteliness’ in the classroom and make sure that we encourage everyone to feel comfortable sharing their individual and social identities.

    Terry Finnigan’s quote about what is lost through living segregated lives is very powerful indeed.

    Reading your blog post makes it abundantly clear how important the Inclusive T&L unit is for creating awareness of ‘whiteliness’ and racism, as well as the work that still needs to be done in order to create a truly anti-racist society.

  2. Svenja,

    I found your blog very honest and open, I agree with may of the things you spoke about, how we need to be aware of our whiteness in our teaching and that our peers and students will not have had the same lived experiences. Also about our privileges that we take for granted just because we are white.

    There is still so much work to be done but with the help of resources like SoN, and by creating open, safe space for students to feel included and to share their thoughts, change can happen.

  3. Hi Svenja, Reading about how Germany talks about its past is so interesting, and unexpected. I would be very interested to know more about how the German education system approaches such a difficult topic. I recently supervised a student from India and was surprised that she felt no resentment at all to the British being in India – in fact she was very positive about British colonialism, and was doing a project that seemed to celebrate it. What does that mean?? And how can we navigate topics about decolonisation when views are so diverse and cannot be predicted?

    • Hi Sunita,

      That’s really interesting about your student! I guess when you have knowledge of the history and legacy, e.g. how history has shaped your nation with the good and the bad, then you can make up your own mind about how you feel about it?! There might also be something about the generational distance to that history.

      When I was at school there was an initiative based on a book called “Erzählt es euren Kindern : Der Holocaust in Europa” by Stephane Bruchfeld (which translates to something like “Tell your kids about it : the holocaust in Europe”) which was all about encouraging teenagers to speak to holocaust survivors and to their own grandparents about the war and the holocaust. Now that I mention this it makes me think a little bit of the tell us about it archives and speaks to it’s power as a historic document of the racism of the 21st century.
      I remember that I was quite hesitant to ask my grandparents any direct questions about it. Then I went to see my granddad with my Brazilian boyfriend at the time when I was in my mid 20s. For my boyfriend it was a one-time chance to speak to anyone with a direct link to WW2 and he did not have any inhibitions about asking – because from his perspective: why wouldn’t you be able to ask about it? So within 5 minutes of being there my granddad was telling us of his experiences of the 1940s, of the terror of the time and the goodwill of individuals.
      That is again an interesting parallel to today’s times when refugees of war-ridden nations try to find safety and are scrutinised for it when only 3-4 generations ago half of Europe was displaced from their homes.

      At one point (in 10th or 11th grade) we were talking about WW2 in 5 different subjects: history, politics/economy, geography, German and art. At the time (being the teenager that I was) I was annoyed and exhausted by how much we had to talk about it from so many different angles. Then we went on a study trip to Auschwitz where we took part in maintaining some of the roads of the camp and learned even more about its many victims.
      At the time I did not appreciate it much but in hindsight I am glad for the historic perspective.

      So I guess that’s maybe my attempt at offering a response to your questions – that the best we can do is have the knowledge and historic perspective with regards to our personal backgrounds, and every individual will deal with history in their own way. There is also a link here to Social Justice Education and creating that critical space, informed by the differences in the room, to foster mutual understanding.

      Sorry this became a bit of an essay…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *